Early Childhood Curriculum

In the United States, there is one method of delivery that requires teachers to totally depend upon the child to lead the direction of study in pre-kindergarten. The "Creative Curriculum" is one movement that is the "buzz". I have problems with the strategies because I am just not a believer that this is best for our students. Others believe that the curriculum for four-year-olds should somehow map to the curriculum for higher grades.


What makes students successful in other countries? Is this the way things are done in the countries where students seem to function in math and science at a higher level than the United States?

Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

Posted Answers

Order by
 

Please read Miseducation: Preschoolers At Risk by David Elkind.  Early childhood education should be a combination of what we know preschoolers should be exposed to at a developmentally appropriate level.  Science, math, language arts, social studies should all be part of the early childhood curriculum, however in a way that is developmentally appropriate.  The curriculum should be well designed and child centered.  Art (not craft) should be a focus as preschoolers display their understanding of the world through art work - 2 dimensional and 3-dimensional.  The program should be play orientated and adults should extend children's understandings through play.  In the USA we focus too much on preparation for kindergarten which is now termed the new 1st grade.  This is a huge mistake as more and more children are moving through the school system lacking in basic skills - socially, emotionally and academically.  The early childhood years, 0-8 years, are the foundation of education in the later years.  My heart breaks when I see so much developmentally inappropriate practice occurring in preschool through 2nd grade.  As an intermediate teacher with solid early childhood training (outside of the US) I see the fallout for not paying enough attention to developmentally appropriate practice in all levels of education.  Research Reggio Emilio in Italy, canvass and pressure our politicians to eliminate No Child Left Behind, which leaves most children behind.  If the US education system does not wake up to what is going on, we will be left behind as a nation in the worldwide economy. 


Posted 7 months ago ( permalink )
In reply to Julian N.'s question
Janine M. was invited by Ask an ePals Teacher to answer this question.

Rated as
#2 out of 6
0
0

Helpful?

line
line
line



 
1 thumb up

for more ideas on Preschool and Education Policy check out my blog: Circle-Time "Lead from the Start" 

I am a National Board Certified preschool teacher in Virginia. I think there are two things to remember about teaching preschoolers. They are capable of more than most people think, (I have 10 reading on a late Kindergarten early first grade level) and that kids must be addressed where they are developmentally. That said it is important to allow content to and student talents and abilities to decide how concepts are taught. At the preschool level this changed some of my core beliefs about how to teach reading. I realized that letter recognition and recognizing letter sounds is a behaviorally oriented activity. Not that some students don't need a more constructivist approach sometimes but the basic idea is: the more times I expose kids to letters and letter sounds the more likely they are to remember them. Period. The instant recall for letter sounds we use as adults in understanding new words is based on this simple recall of sounds and grammatic rules. This freed me up from having to do a hands on activity for every letter to help kids "remember" the letter. All I had to do was submerge them in the alphabet for them to learn the letters. So, I changed how I taught.

Changes that I made to my teaching included:

  • singing 3 - 5 different alphabet and letter sound songs every day
  • singing these songs daily at the same time and in transitions between activities
  • incorporating movement into songs
  • dedicating one of 3 "small groups" every day to letter recognition/letter sounds and stories
  • asking students to name letters consistently through out the day (not just at certain times)
  • teach all of the letters from day one instead of one letter at a time
  • focused direct teaching of letters students were not learning quickly instead of following a prescribed order

Of course, I did some of these things already but, it is the way that I did them that changed. It is the repetition that made them stick, not the cute art activity that we did this week for letter G.

Now that I am teaching my students how to read independently I am using more constructivist methods like word building, games, sorts and real reading of real texts.

Moving from standards referenced to standards based has meant that some of the "cute" activities that we did in the past don't get done. I do make time once or twice a week for those cute activities and as an artist I passionately encourage creativity in all its forms in my class. I haven't had any complaints from parents. They are happy their preschoolers are reading.

Posted 7 months ago ( permalink )
In reply to Julian N.'s question
Rated as
#6 out of 6
1
0

Helpful?

line
line
line



 

Thank you Janie for your response.  I am also curious as to how other countries (the ones that are surpassing us in mathematics and science) address preschool education.  I agree that content should be age-appropriate, but I still wonder if we are missing the mark somehow.  How does China teach its young children?  What secrets do Asian countries know that allows them to lead in math, science and technology?  Is it related to the foundation that we give our children in early childhood education?


Posted 7 months ago ( permalink )
In reply to Janine M.'s answer
Rated as
#3 out of 6
0
0

Helpful?

line
line
line



 

 

Thank you for this information John.  How do we share these findings with the masses in the United States....those in charge of constructing the educational experience?  It really bothered me when we started moving toward "fluffy" education in the public school pre-kindergarten setting.  I truly believe within my heart that there is a way to develop

age-appropriate early childhood education that maps to the higher-education curriculum.  I don't have the "research" to back up my "gut" feeling.  But this research that you have shared is truly an eye-opener!

Posted 6 months ago ( permalink )
In reply to JOHN H.'s answer
Rated as
#4 out of 6
0
0

Helpful?

line
line
line